Skip to content

Shruti’s Method

How Shruti N Shirishkar Reviews a Floor Plan for Vastu

A Vastu floor-plan review begins with the complete property context. Shruti N Shirishkar first establishes what type of property is being reviewed, whether the directional reference is reliable, how the spaces are actually being used and which parts of the layout are fixed before priorities are discussed.

Individual rooms or observations are considered within the larger property rather than treated as isolated rules.

This Insight explains Shruti’s review sequence. It does not provide a score for a particular property and does not replace a consultation on an individual floor plan.

By Shruti N Shirishkar

The property type sets the practical limits

The first question is what kind of property the plan represents. A flat or apartment, an independent house, a rented home, a property still being planned, a completed property, a commercial workplace and an industrial site each carry different practical limits. What can be considered in a property under design is quite different from what a tenant is permitted to adjust in a rented flat, and a workplace also has operational requirements that a home does not.

Illustrative example

Two flats can carry similar room labels on paper, yet differ in orientation, entrance position, fixed services and how the household actually uses each space. For that reason they are not treated identically in a review. This example is illustrative and is not a client case.

Directional accuracy comes before interpretation

Directions decide how the rest of the plan is read, so they are clarified before zones or placements are interpreted. If the directional information on a drawing is uncertain, missing or inconsistent with the property, the sensible step is to clarify it rather than continue on a guess. An interpretation built on an unreliable direction is not worth acting on.

Getting the supporting material right early avoids most of this uncertainty. The online consultation preparation guide explains what is useful to share.

Zones as a way to discuss the layout

Zones are used as a structured way to talk about how different parts of a property sit within the directional context of the whole layout. They give the discussion a shared vocabulary so that a specific room can be placed in relation to the rest of the property instead of being judged on its own.

A zone observation is not a guaranteed life outcome and it is not an automatic instruction to change the structure of a property. Divyorra does not publish do-it- yourself zone charts that map a part of a home to health, wealth or marriage results, because that kind of table removes the property context that the review depends on.

How the space is actually used

Room labels on a drawing do not always match daily life. A room marked as a bedroom may function as a study, a spare room may have become a home office, and a dining area may serve mostly as storage. Shruti considers the actual use alongside the plan, since the way a household lives in a property affects which observations matter.

Understanding real use makes the guidance more usable. It does not create any promise about outcomes.

What is fixed in the property

Every property carries conditions that cannot realistically be moved. These commonly include:

  • Structural walls and columns
  • Entrance position
  • Plumbing lines, shafts and ducts
  • Windows and openings
  • Building services and installed infrastructure
  • Landlord restrictions in a rented property
  • Society or building rules

Recognising these conditions early keeps the discussion honest. Guidance that assumes a structural wall can be removed or that plumbing can be relocated on a whim is either impossible to follow or so disruptive that nobody acts on it, which helps no one.

Rented homes carry the tightest limits, and the rented flats Insight looks at that situation in more detail.

Sorting observations by priority

Once the property context is clear, Shruti separates the observations into what deserves attention first, what is secondary, what is a fixed condition to be accepted, and what needs more information before anything can be said about it.

  • Points that deserve attention first
  • Secondary observations worth noting
  • Fixed conditions that will remain as they are
  • Points that need further clarification or material

There is no numeric severity score in this process and no language about dangerous or fatal defects. The purpose of the ordering is to give a property owner a clear sense of sequence.

Practical options that can be discussed

Depending on the property, the available options may involve:

  • How a particular space is used
  • Placement of activity within a room
  • Furniture and functional arrangement
  • Movement and circulation through the property
  • A non-structural adjustment suited to the property
  • Something to consider during a future renovation
  • A fixed condition that simply remains as it is

Major demolition is never assumed as the starting point. Not every option is a remedy, and describing them that way would misrepresent what is being suggested. Any option discussed also stays within architectural, engineering, fire-safety, accessibility and regulatory requirements that apply to the property.

Explaining the reasoning behind each point

Each point is connected back to the property type, the directional context, the relevant zone, the actual use of the space, the fixed constraints and the options that remain available. When one observation is placed ahead of another, the reason for that ordering is explained rather than stated as an instruction.

This is a traditional discipline applied with judgement about a specific property. No claim of scientific proof is made for it.

What a remote review can and cannot show

A floor plan does not show everything about a property. Photographs, property context and a short walkthrough video can add information that a drawing leaves out. Clarification may still be needed in situations such as these:

  • Directions on the drawing are uncertain
  • The drawing is incomplete
  • Room use has changed since the plan was made
  • Fixed features are missing from the drawing
  • Photographs conflict with what the plan shows
  • Property complexity goes beyond the material available

Many residential reviews can begin online when the information is accurate enough. An on-site review may be considered where direct observation would genuinely add something. A remote review is not claimed to be identical to or always sufficient in place of an on-site visit.

Vastu floor-plan guidance does not replace structural, architectural, engineering, electrical, plumbing, fire-safety, legal, medical or financial advice where required.

Written by

Shruti N Shirishkar is the founder of Divyorra, a Mumbai-based Vedic Vastu Shastra expert and Numerologist. Her work focuses on understanding the real context of a space, explaining the reasoning and keeping recommendations practical within the property’s constraints.

Want Shruti to review your property, or learn the method?

If you want your own floor plan reviewed, the Home Vastu Consultation page explains how a review begins. If you would rather understand the reasoning for yourself, the Vedic Vastu Shastra Course covers the method in a structured way.

More Insights